Loppsi 2: the Senate adopts the penal malpractice against squats
LEMONDE.FR with AFP ¦ 20.01.11 ¦ 2:45 pm · Updated the 20.01.11 ¦ 2:55 pm
The senatorial majority finally confirmed, on Thursday, January 20th in session, within the framework of the examination of the project Loppsi 2, the creation of a penal malpractice against squats and precarious housing while the Law commission had deleted(eliminated) her(it) at first.
The majority adopted Christian Demuynck's amendment (UMP, Seine-Saint-Denis) in the article 32 ter A, stipulating that " is punished for the same punishments(efforts) the fact for occupying the place of residence of others without the authorization of the owner or the tenant, except the cases where the law allows it, and not to leave him(it) at once at the request of the owner or of the tenant ".
" We have finally an answer adapted against the squat! It is unbearable that an individual can benefit from a place of residence which does not belong to him(her) to the detriment of her owner or tenant.
This amendment is henceforth going to simplify the approach(initiative) of eviction not only to the victims but also to the public authorities ", underlined Mr Demuynck in a communiqué.
" The procedure of planned exception by-passes the judiciary. The HOMELESS PEOPLE, the travellers, the occupants of alternative(alternate) housing, any treaties as the eccentrics are aimed ", protested in session Josiane Mathon-Poinat (CRC-SPG, communists and Left-wing party). The reporter of the Law commission, Jean-Patrick Courtois (UMP), opposed in vain to this amendment, judging that the objective " was already satisfied by the current right(law) ".
The article 32 ter A aimed initially at facilitating the procedure of eviction of the illicit camps, in particular Roma, and spread(widened) him(her,it) to the mobile residences in illegal car park. The Senate in first reading had deleted(eliminated) this extension. The National Assembly in second reading confirmed this change but had introduced an incrimination for squats.
This incrimination had been deleted(eliminated) by the Law commission of the Senate before being revotée in session on Thursday.
Several associations and the left protested against this article and on Thursday the activists of the DAL (right in the accommodation(housing)) spread(displayed) a banner in front of the Senate whereas teepees, yurts and tents were raised at the edge of the Garonne in Toulouse.
LEMONDE.FR with AFP ¦ 20.01.11 ¦ 2:45 pm · Updated the 20.01.11 ¦ 2:55 pm
The senatorial majority finally confirmed, on Thursday, January 20th in session, within the framework of the examination of the project Loppsi 2, the creation of a penal malpractice against squats and precarious housing while the Law commission had deleted(eliminated) her(it) at first.
The majority adopted Christian Demuynck's amendment (UMP, Seine-Saint-Denis) in the article 32 ter A, stipulating that " is punished for the same punishments(efforts) the fact for occupying the place of residence of others without the authorization of the owner or the tenant, except the cases where the law allows it, and not to leave him(it) at once at the request of the owner or of the tenant ".
" We have finally an answer adapted against the squat! It is unbearable that an individual can benefit from a place of residence which does not belong to him(her) to the detriment of her owner or tenant.
This amendment is henceforth going to simplify the approach(initiative) of eviction not only to the victims but also to the public authorities ", underlined Mr Demuynck in a communiqué.
" The procedure of planned exception by-passes the judiciary. The HOMELESS PEOPLE, the travellers, the occupants of alternative(alternate) housing, any treaties as the eccentrics are aimed ", protested in session Josiane Mathon-Poinat (CRC-SPG, communists and Left-wing party). The reporter of the Law commission, Jean-Patrick Courtois (UMP), opposed in vain to this amendment, judging that the objective " was already satisfied by the current right(law) ".
The article 32 ter A aimed initially at facilitating the procedure of eviction of the illicit camps, in particular Roma, and spread(widened) him(her,it) to the mobile residences in illegal car park. The Senate in first reading had deleted(eliminated) this extension. The National Assembly in second reading confirmed this change but had introduced an incrimination for squats.
This incrimination had been deleted(eliminated) by the Law commission of the Senate before being revotée in session on Thursday.
Several associations and the left protested against this article and on Thursday the activists of the DAL (right in the accommodation(housing)) spread(displayed) a banner in front of the Senate whereas teepees, yurts and tents were raised at the edge of the Garonne in Toulouse.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire